The number of URLs in the Good

fahimfoysal05

Have a big impact: Pages that score Good in Core Web Vitals achieve an attractive level of user experience and can benefit from a boost in the page experience component of the ranking, provided that the other components of the ranking page experience signal (, mobile usability, etc.) are deemed correct. We conducted a study to uncover any trends and dependencies the next Core Web Vitals update might bring, as well as determine the impact it might have on sites. In this article, you will learn the main findings of the study, the methodology used.

Practical advice Last Review on how to analyze a site's Core Web Vitals and the steps you can take to improve them. Main findings of the study The main conclusions of this study are as follows: The same web page can have different scores between mobile and computer. Different areas need to be considered when optimizing a particular web page. The number of URLs in the Poor category is higher for mobile than for desktop. (A URL is considered Poor if at least one of the three metrics falls into the Poor category).




Category is also higher on desktop than on mobile. This could mean it's harder to optimize for mobile search than desktop. URLs with a good score on essential signals already perform well in searches. The higher a URL is in the rankings, the more optimized it is. Most desktop and mobile URLs have positive Largest Contentful Paint scores. Optimizing Core Web Vitals could already be a way to improve search rankings. Metrics for mobile and desktop vary for all URLs. img-semblog Methodology The methodology we applied for this study is summarized as follows.